Tag: Somaliland

Somaliland: UAE built the port. Diaspora writes the checks. Now Israel and Taiwan Want in

Somaliland: UAE built the port. Diaspora writes the checks. Now Israel and Taiwan want in.

Seven months on from recognition, the focus is pivoting from aid to hard investment. Here is what that actually looks like on the ground.

This is a bonus edition of Horn Horizons, part of the Global Power Shifts network, where I track Power, Ports, and Prosperity across the Horn and the Red Sea.

Somaliland is the closest thing the Horn has to a live experiment. A state recognized by only one country is trying to turn a Gulf-grade port and diaspora savings into a real economy. Israel and Taiwan test the edges, while the wider neighborhood watches what a single recognition unlocks.

The open question is whether any serious capital beyond the diaspora’s own actually shows up. To find out who’s buying, and where the pitch runs ahead of the plumbing beneath it, I sat down with Hana Kaise Abdi, founding partner of Bilow Capital , who guides foreign investors into Somaliland on the ground in Hargeisa.

Israel became the first and so far only country to recognize Somaliland in December last year, over objections from the African Union, the Arab League and, loudest of all, Mogadishu. A state recognized by just one country can’t borrow on international markets or draw on the development banks, so the capital that builds Somaliland arrives as investment, not debt, and most of it comes via the diaspora.

Remittances to Somalia as a whole, Somaliland included, run around $3 billion a year, much of it into land, property and businesses, and seven months on that hasn’t shifted. DP World is expanding its Berbera port terminal and the dismantling of USAID under the Trump administration has pushed donors to talk investment where they once focused on grants, but the buyer writing the checks is still overwhelmingly Somaliland’s own.

Hana wants to widen that pool. British-born, raised in Bristol by parents who fled the civil war, she moved to Hargeisa about seven years ago and co-founded Bilow Capital, which walks foreign investors through market research and due diligence, runs an accelerator, the Bilow Venture Lab, and since February has deployed a diaspora-backed fund, the Rise Fund, into startups that complete the cohort.

“The private sector’s the real route for sustainable development,” she tells me, a conviction that hardened as she watched the 2017 famine from the UK. She’s paid on the investment flow she describes, which is reason enough to hear her out and to read the numbers with that interest attached.

Recognition moved faster than the money

The harder assets moved earlier. DP World has run Berbera since 2017 and is building it toward a 2 million-container capacity, with a direct Jebel Ali service launched some eight months ago, and Hana treats the port as proof of concept — “a great symbol for what can be achieved if more foreign investors came in.”What the port mostly ships is the economy’s mainstay: live sheep and goats bound for Saudi Arabia and the Gulf, which made up about two-thirds of exports in 2024 and peak each year around Hajj time. Much of the investment case is a bet on diversifying away from that single artery.

The politics that dominate the headlines have, so far, left that balance sheet alone, which is the part that matters for anyone pricing exposure. Somalia’s annulment of its agreements with the UAE in January landed on federal Somalia and Abu Dhabi’s bases there, not on Berbera, and Hana reports no measurable effect on Somaliland itself. The 2024 memorandum meant to grant Ethiopia sea access for a step toward recognition is effectively frozen, and she doesn’t oversell it, calling Ethiopian investment interest “a matter of time” rather than a live pipeline.

Where she sees the newest interest is Taiwan, the Gulf, and Israel:

  • Taiwan: A natural counterpart — a self-governing island much of the world declines to call a country, for fear of provoking Beijing, yet trades with anyway. It moved earliest in hard assets, years before recognition was on the table: in 2021 Taiwan’s state oil company, CPC, took a 49% stake in a Somaliland exploration block, SL10B/13, operated by the British-Turkish firm Genel Energy, whose Toosan-1 prospect is estimated at up to 650 million barrels. Nothing’s out of the ground yet. The block’s still at the exploration stage, with no commercial well drilled, and Genel has been seeking a licence extension that would push a first drilling deadline toward 2027, even as its Taiwanese partner presses to move faster. Other Taiwanese firms are active in mining, fisheries, and agriculture.
  • The Gulf: Runs UAE-first, with Saudi money as the natural extension of that livestock trade.
  • Israel: The freshest and the least monetized. The areas she flags are agriculture and water (desalination and irrigation, where Israeli firms lead), technology, digital health, and health care, alongside a Red Sea security logic that’s really about the view it buys: Berbera sits across the water from Yemen, a vantage point on the Houthis and the Bab el-Mandeb chokepoint. “Very early days,” Hana said. That stretch of water’s stayed in the headlines, with the Iran-aligned Houthis recently attacking two Saudi oil tankers about 70 nautical miles southwest of Al Shuqaiq, near the strait.

The interview

Edited for length and clarity. The figures are hers unless attributed otherwise.

Q: Who’s actually putting money in?

Hana: The biggest chunk is the diaspora, without question. There’s remittance of roughly $3 billion, and while a lot of that’s consumption, a large amount goes into investment. There isn’t hard data I can point you to, but I’m diaspora, as is my whole extended family, and you can see it: a lot of the real estate is diaspora-owned, a lot of land, a lot of businesses.

Beyond that, there are two types of clients I work with. One is private-sector investors looking for market-rate returns, interested in fisheries, agriculture, mining, manufacturing, usually businesses from the Middle East or high-net-worth individuals. The other is development agencies trying to move away from the aid model into an investment model, who want to put money into things like the venture lab and the fund.

Her $3 billion figure’s worth a footnote. Remittances on that order are the standard estimate for Somalia as a whole, not Somaliland alone, and the investment share of it isn’t separately documented, a caveat she volunteers herself. Read it as direction, not measurement.

Q: What do your founders actually lack?

Hana: Capital, of course, is the first thing. But it goes beyond that. A lot of founders have brilliant ideas, and sometimes even the savings to start, but no procedures in place: financial management, operations, human resources, talent retention.

And formalization. One founder we worked with had a strong business and co-founders, but nothing was legalized or formalized, and it ended with him not being able to raise investment because of that. Moving from the informal to the formal economy is a huge missing link. Then working capital, because a lot of small businesses have no access to finance at all. And regulation, where the government hasn’t yet built an environment suited to small and medium businesses.

Q: Why the emphasis on women founders specifically?

Hana: There are a substantial number of female business owners, but they’re underrepresented and they don’t get the same opportunities. A lot of them don’t see themselves applying for something like an accelerator. They feel they might be excluded from it. So we push to bring the existing female founders through the cohorts, so they’re not left behind and get the same access to finance. It also gives them independence in their own lives and the ability to make a living themselves.

Q: For a non-diaspora investor, what about the legal framework? You’re, on paper, part of Somalia.

Hana: In practice, Somalia doesn’t regulate anything inside Somaliland, not the legal system, not the economy, definitely not the politics. Most investors just register their business here. If you go through the correct legal channels and the business or asset is in your name, and a dispute occurs with a partner on the ground, it’s very difficult to lose that case in the courts.

Some investors also choose to execute their contracts in the UAE or the UK. Either way it’s workable. The biggest misconception is how safe and how easy it actually is. As someone who’s traveled all over, Somaliland’s one of the safest places I’ve been

She’s talking about physical security, not investment risk, and there the UK Foreign Office is more cautious than she is; more on that below.

Her numbers, and the wider picture

Bilow doesn’t yet have an audited track record, and Hana’s candid that it’s early. In under a year, the venture lab has run two cohorts with about 46% female participation. Since launching the fund in February the firm has invested in 10 businesses, and seen more than 80% of participants qualify for investment after the program. One founder, she said, raised more than $200,000 in a single round, and others have opened second branches in Hargeisa or been approached directly by investors. The Rise Fund is structured as an open-ended, evergreen vehicle and began deploying immediately rather than waiting for a first close, which it hasn’t yet reached.

These are the firm’s own figures, from a party raising capital on the strength of them and with no independent registry to test them against, so read them as a founder’s self-report, not a verified return. What can be checked is the opportunity she points to, and the public record broadly supports her framing:

  • Fisheries: Her claim that the fisheries are barely exploited holds up: sector assessments put under 10% of stocks worked on a Gulf of Aden coast that ranks among East Africa’s richer fishing grounds.
  • Manufacturing: Her pitch rests on the country importing more than 90% of what it consumes, which she frames as room for import substitution rather than a solved problem.
  • Legal comfort: Real on paper, as Somaliland’s investment law grants foreign investors national treatment, a three-year tax holiday, and import-tax exemptions on equipment.

What the pitch leaves out

The formalization trap Hana cautions against is also the market’s central risk. When a viable business misses out simply because its founders never put proper contracts in place, the constraint isn’t a lack of ideas, but the fragile foundation beneath it. No accelerator program can substitute for commercial law, functional courts, or a regulator built to support small business. It’s the exact same gap a foreign investor inherits.

Recognition sits on the same ledger. Somaliland’s record of stability and peaceful transfers is real, and the safety case Hana makes is strong on its own terms, but the same non-recognition that shuts out sovereign debt also shuts out the political-risk insurance and development-finance guarantees that de-risk large projects, which is why what moves is still mostly diaspora equity and word of mouth. Her own workaround, registering locally but signing contracts under UAE or UK law, is a rational hedge and an admission of what the domestic framework can’t yet guarantee.

And she’s describing day-to-day Hargeisa, not the whole risk picture: the UK Foreign Office still advises against all but essential travel to Somaliland, and Houthi leader Abdul-Malik al-Houthi declared in a televised address, days after recognition, that any Israeli presence in Somaliland would be treated as “a military target” (Times of Israel). A serious investor prices the corridor, not the city alone.

Somaliland’s story has moved faster than its balance sheet. Recognition, a Gulf-grade port, and the dismantling of USAID driven by Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s DOGE have made ‘investment, not aid’ the language everyone in Hargeisa now speaks, and Hana’s fluent in it because she’s been making that argument since before it was fashionable. But the buyers are still overwhelmingly the diaspora, because that’s most of what a largely unrecognized state has to work with, and Israeli recognition isn’t yet a financing system.

That’s also why the founders she works with keep being held back by the same unglamorous things: lack of paperwork, working capital, and basic regulation. The pitch works on paper, but the legal and regulatory rails beneath it remain fragile. I’d watch whether the aid-to-investment pivot converts into deployed private capital, and whether government policy catches up with the headlines by building the legal and banking infrastructure small businesses actually need.

The bottom line

So, who wants to invest in Somaliland? For now, the people who already believe in it.

  • The diaspora: Writes these checks because it’s personally invested in seeing Somaliland thrive, beyond the returns.
  • Israel: Has named its interests but not yet its money.
  • Taiwan: Has paid for an oil block it still has to drill.
  • The Gulf: Already the anchor customer, taking the live sheep and goats that remain the economy’s mainstay. For Abu Dhabi, Berbera is the template for doing business with an unrecognized state, feeding its wider ports strategy across Africa.
  • Ethiopia: Berbera offers the landlocked country sea access, a huge priority for Addis, and a way to diversify away from Djibouti, through which some 95% of its trade travels. DP World signed a 2021 memorandum of understanding with Addis to invest up to $1 billion in the Berbera-Ethiopia trade corridor, though where that agreement stands today is an open question.

The next twelve months will show which of those turns into deployed capital.

Between Maritime Access and Recognition: Geopolitical Implications of Rapprochement Between Ethiopia and Somaliland

Between Maritime Access and Recognition: Geopolitical Implications of Rapprochement Between Ethiopia and Somaliland

Recent statements by Somaliland’s foreign minister, Abdirahman Dahir Adam, also known as “Bakal” — affirming Ethiopia’s right to sea access and Hargeisa’s readiness to discuss this issue with the Ethiopian government — have reignited debate over Ethiopia-Somaliland relations. These remarks carry particular weight in the context of shifting power dynamics around the Red Sea, where intensifying global competition over maritime routes underscores the growing strategic importance of ports and logistical infrastructure. At the heart of this debate lies a structural geopolitical dilemma: Ethiopia’s landlocked geography on one side, and Somaliland’s uncertain status within the regional order on the other. The challenge extends beyond bilateral ties between Hargeisa and Addis Ababa, encompassing questions of sovereignty, recognition, and the balance of power in the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea region.

The interview given by Somaliland’s foreign minister to the Ethiopian newspaper The Reporter on June 6, 2026, conveyed several key messages that reveal the implications and motives behind the revival of this maritime cooperation issue, the future of relations between Somaliland and Ethiopia, and the ongoing transformations in the Horn of Africa:

First, the statements emphasized the flexibility of the new administration in Hargeisa and its openness toward its Ethiopian neighbor. They suggest that Somaliland may not necessarily require formal Ethiopian recognition at this stage, but rather seeks to strengthen its partnerships with Addis Ababa and other regional and international actors. This approach is intended to bolster Somaliland’s de facto legitimacy and improve its negotiating position with Mogadishu, even in the absence of legal recognition. Despite growing expectations among Somaliland’s leadership and elite that friendly countries like Ethiopia and Kenya might follow Israel’s lead in recognizing Somaliland, Bakal clarified that his government respects Ethiopia’s policy and would never push Addis Ababa toward recognition. He expressed confidence, however, that Ethiopia will eventually view Somaliland as “a reliable and stable partner that it will eventually recognize.” This reflects a growing awareness in Hargeisa that the real value lies not only in potential recognition, but in positioning Somaliland as an indispensable partner in regional arrangements concerning ports, trade, and logistical corridors.

Second, the interview paved the way for a new negotiating track. When the Somaliland minister was asked how far his country’s new administration had changed its policy toward neighboring Ethiopia, which he described as Somaliland’s closest and most important ally in the Horn of Africa, and whether the administration wished to revive the controversial memorandum of understanding with Ethiopia, he did not provide a direct answer. Instead, he shifted the discussion away from the memorandum itself, which he said was “not the only thing” possible in the course of cooperation between the two sides, and emphasized the broader idea that Hargeisa understood Ethiopia’s maritime needs and was prepared to discuss them. He also noted that Ethiopia could make greater use of the port of Berbera, which, according to him, has not yet happened. This formulation does not necessarily indicate a formal return to the memorandum of understanding. Rather, it reflects an attempt to reproduce the strategic logic on which the memorandum was based, with a view to reintroducing it within a new negotiating framework that is less politically costly and more diplomatically acceptable. In other words, Hargeisa may be seeking to separate the strategic project from the legal and political framework that has raised regional and international objections, by presenting maritime cooperation with Ethiopia as a long-term economic and logistical project rather than a geopolitical maneuver conditional on recognition or one that infringes on questions of sovereignty.

Third, Hargeisa is seeking to capitalize on regional transformations that enhance Somaliland’s geostrategic value. This is especially true of developments related to the war with Iran and its proxies, and their repercussions for Red Sea security and global supply chains. These developments have led to a reassessment of the strategic importance of ports and vital coastal sites in the Horn of Africa, including the port of Berbera. The port is becoming increasingly attractive, especially for Ethiopia, as one of the potential alternatives for reducing its dependence on Djibouti. It is also gaining relevance as part of the broader restructuring of regional transport and trade networks, as well as emerging maritime security arrangements.

The chances of reviving the maritime access issue and reaching new arrangements between Ethiopia and Somaliland have increased

The prospects for reviving maritime cooperation and reaching new arrangements between Ethiopia and Somaliland appear stronger than before. Despite the uncertainty created by the “Ankara Declaration” signed between Ethiopia and Somalia in late 2024, several drivers continue to support — and even reinforce — the potential for a deeper partnership.

First, Internal Pressures: Domestic circumstances in both countries create incentives to break the deadlock, opening space for development and joint growth. Both governments increasingly recognize the feasibility of partnership, given the convergence of economic and strategic interests.

Second, Somaliland’s Growing Assertiveness: Somaliland’s recent success in consolidating power has emboldened Hargeisa to challenge Mogadishu more directly, strengthening its confidence in pursuing independent arrangements.

Third, Port Negotiations: Statements by Somaliland’s foreign minister did not rule out the possibility of granting Ethiopia a sovereign seaport. Rather, they suggested a willingness to negotiate better terms or wait for more favorable timing, signaling flexibility rather than outright rejection.

Fourth, Somalia’s Instability: The deteriorating situation in Somalia — marked by the federal government’s crisis of legitimacy and accumulated failures to establish a stable governance model in the south — creates further openings for Somaliland to advance alternative arrangements.

Fifth, Regional and International Context: Potential regional supporters for this type of arrangement, combined with growing international concern over Red Sea security and global supply chains, may help create an enabling environment for expanding logistical cooperation. While comprehensive political agreements remain unlikely in the near term, these dynamics could sustain incremental progress in maritime collaboration.

On the other hand, this path faces significant structural and political obstacles. Foremost among them is the legal status of Somaliland, which remains unrecognized internationally, and the firm position of Mogadishu, which enjoys broad support from the African Union and most international partners. In addition, the Ankara Declaration has created a new political reality that may make any Ethiopian return to unilateral arrangements with Hargeisa more politically and diplomatically costly. Such a move could be interpreted as a retreat from Ethiopia’s efforts to maintain calm with Somalia, especially given Addis Ababa’s ambitious demands — including a military base — and its declining reliance on Somalia, which is unable to offer a credible alternative for port access.

Beyond these bilateral challenges, the fragile balance of power in the Red Sea, overlapping interests of regional actors, and the sensitivity of port-related issues add further complications. The volatility of the regional security environment undermines the prospects for sovereign agreements and weakens the ability of both parties to commit to long-term arrangements that require durable political and security stability.

The resurgence of Ethiopia-Somaliland maritime cooperation reflects broader regional transformations. The revival of the idea of granting Ethiopia maritime access through Somaliland goes beyond economic and logistical considerations. It constitutes a critical test of sovereignty, recognition, and influence in the Horn of Africa, with far-reaching implications for relations between Mogadishu and Hargeisa, broader geopolitical balances in the region, and the interests of external powers.

1. Implications for Mogadishu-Hargeisa Relations 

For Mogadishu and Hargeisa, the issue is not merely about port facilities for Ethiopia — it sets a political precedent that directly touches on sovereignty and legitimacy. Any maritime arrangement between Ethiopia and Somaliland would deepen the divide between Somalia and Somaliland, exacerbating long-standing disputes, particularly against the backdrop of Somaliland’s normalization of relations with Israel.

While Somalia’s federal government asserts its full and exclusive authority over all Somali territory, including Hargeisa and Berbera, and threatens to use force to reintegrate Somaliland into the Somali federal state, the most dangerous aspect may not be the Somali response itself. Rather, it lies in the interplay of internal and external factors that continue to deepen the rift between the ruling elites in the south and north. The Somaliland issue is no longer merely an internal political matter that can be resolved through dialogue or gradual containment. It has become a distinct reality intertwined with regional and international calculations and interests that extend beyond the control of Somali and Somaliland leaders.

2. Implications for Regional Balances

The Ethiopia-Somaliland partnership exemplifies the intensifying geopolitical competition in the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea. In recent years, the region has undergone profound transformations, with the focus shifting from security issues, border disputes, and counterterrorism to ports, sea lanes, and logistics infrastructure.

Strengthening cooperation with Ethiopia would mark a qualitative leap for Somaliland, expanding its network of foreign relations and strengthening its position at the heart of the regional and geopolitical equation. It would also place Hargeisa on a clearer path toward broader international engagement as a de facto independent actor. In return, it would significantly advance Ethiopia’s strategic project to build maritime influence, including securing a permanent port and military base on the Red Sea coast. Such a development could redefine Ethiopia’s regional role and reshape the balance of power and maritime security equations in this vital corridor and the wider region.

The Future of the Ethiopia-Somaliland Partnership

Available evidence suggests that the partnership between Addis Ababa and Hargeisa will be shaped not only by internal dynamics and political will, but also by evolving regional balances across the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa. Expectations regarding maritime access and political recognition fluctuate between three possible scenarios.

Scenario 1:The Expansion of Functional Cooperation

This scenario builds on the existing trajectory of gradual cooperation, focusing on economic rather than political dimensions. It could involve greater use of the Port of Berbera, development of trade routes and infrastructure, and the creation of special economic zones. Crucially, it avoids sensitive political or sovereign arrangements that could be interpreted as implicit recognition of Somaliland or affecting its current legal status.

Grounded in pragmatism, this path allows both sides to achieve economic gains while minimizing political risks. It provides a practical and predictable framework with fewer risks, including those perceived by Somalilanders, southern Somali unionists, and their regional allies. This approach also aligns with the Ankara Declaration and with the preference of many international partners to promote economic integration while preserving the existing legal framework. It is therefore the most realistic and achievable scenario in the short and medium term, and it could evolve gradually through cumulative implementation steps rather than through a comprehensive political agreement.

Scenario 2: Negotiating a New Formula That Could Lead to Ethiopian Recognition of Somaliland

This scenario assumes that the governments of Abiy Ahmed and Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi, better known as “Irro”, will engage in serious discussions that could lead to reviving or improving the previous memorandum of understanding. This could result in a more comprehensive agreement granting Ethiopia long-term maritime privileges in exchange for political and economic gains for Somaliland. These gains could include formal recognition or steps that approach it in practice.

This scenario reflects Ethiopia’s growing maritime ambitions and Somaliland’s increasing confidence in its ability to expand its foreign policy options. However, its realization remains dependent on changes in the regional and international environment. First, Ethiopia would need to be convinced that the strategic gains outweigh the potential costs of deviating from the understandings established by the Ankara Declaration. This makes the scenario possible, though less likely, in the foreseeable future.

Scenario 3: Strategic Stagnation

In this scenario, political and diplomatic constraints prevent a breakthrough on the maritime access issue, leaving relations between the two parties uncertain. This scenario could gain strength if renewed momentum emerges in the reconciliation process between Ethiopia and Somalia. It could also become more likely if leadership priorities or political calculations change in Addis Ababa, Hargeisa, or Mogadishu. Additionally, Mogadishu’s ability to mobilize regional and international pressure could increase, leading to the containment or obstruction of any arrangements to which it is not a party. This would, in turn, reduce opportunities for maritime cooperation between Ethiopia and Somaliland.

However, such a stalemate would not address the root causes of the problem, including Ethiopia’s geographical constraints, Somaliland’s limited legal status, and increasing regional competition over sea lanes. These factors make this scenario less sustainable in the medium and long term.

Conclusions

Recent developments in relations between Ethiopia and Somaliland reveal that the issue of Ethiopian maritime access is re-emerging within new regional dynamics. Despite the constraints imposed by the Ankara Declaration and the sensitivity of the Somali sovereignty question, the motives driving both parties have become more urgent.

However, the future of this path will likely depend on the parties’ ability to reconcile the imperatives of economic geography with the requirements of political legitimacy. This makes the gradual expansion of functional economic and logistical cooperation the most likely scenario in the foreseeable future.

By contrast, the scenario of reviving the memorandum of understanding in a modified form that includes official recognition or sovereign arrangements remains contingent on deeper regional and international transformations, as well as shifting calculations among key actors. This makes the maritime access issue itself a central determinant of regional stability and a pivotal factor in reshaping the geopolitical order in the Horn of Africa in the coming years.

Source: Emirates Policy Center

Why Rahm Emanuel Misjudged Netanyahu’s Somaliland Strategy

Why Rahm Emanuel Misjudged Netanyahu’s Somaliland Strategy

Recognizing the independent republic is the opening move to anchor Israel as an indispensable security power in the region.

On a recent visit to Israel, former Obama administration Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel mocked Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Somaliland strategy, arguing that Israel had “lost Europe” and “lost America,” and was left with only the small republic in the Horn of Africa.

He badly misread Netanyahu’s strategic calculus. Israel’s recognition of Somaliland is Israel’s most strategically consequential foreign-policy move in years. Far from diminishing its Western alignment, this opening gambit positions Israel as the indispensable security guarantor of the world’s most critical maritime corridors, exponentially increasing its value to both the United States and Europe.

Israel’s recognition of Somaliland roots the Jewish state firmly in its own region—the Middle East and the Red Sea—where its future will actually be decided, not in Washington or Europe. By expanding its partnership with Eritrea and deepening ties with Ethiopia, Somaliland and Sudan, Israel will become the ultimate security guarantor of the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Arabian Sea and the southwestern Indian Ocean.

Partnering with Horn of Africa nations allows Israel to deploy its advanced technology and agriculture to lift hundreds of millions out of poverty, cementing it as an undeniable force for good.

In doing so, Israel will make itself indispensable to the security and economy of Europe, America and the Gulf states threatened by Iran. The West supports Israel not out of sentiment, but because it is indispensable to security and economic interests. During the Cold War, Israel contained Soviet influence and hostile Arab states; today, its strategic role in counterterrorism remains unmatched.

However, Israel was strongest when it had alliances with regional actors, such as Iran, Turkey and an Ethiopia that controlled Eritrea and the Red Sea. Today, Iran and Turkey are enemies, while a struggling Ethiopia is choked off from the sea, denied access to Eritrean ports by Eritrean dictator Isaias Afwerki. This tyrant now aligns with Iran, opposes Israel, fuels Sudan’s Muslim Brotherhood, tried to block Somaliland’s independence, and actively backs the Houthis and Al-Shabaab to destabilize the region.

Today, Israel counts the Gulf states, particularly the United Arab Emirates, as allies, while Saudi Arabia navigates the volatile landscape left by America’s regional retreat. If Israel steps up to secure the region, Saudi Arabia will inevitably fall into alignment once Israel proves it is the only reliable security provider in the Red Sea.

Israel’s traditional Arab adversaries—Iraq, Syria, Libya and Yemen—have collapsed, only to be replaced by a far more volatile threat: radical non-state Islamist actors like Hezbollah and the Houthis, alongside the imminent rise of Iran-backed forces in Sudan. Meanwhile, severe economic crises render Israel’s cold peace with Egypt and Jordan entirely unpredictable.

Partnering with Horn of Africa nations allows Israel to deploy its advanced technology and agriculture to lift hundreds of millions out of poverty, cementing it as an undeniable force for good.

Israel must forge a new security apparatus tailored to its own survival while making itself indispensable to the United States and Europe. This requires crushing the Houthis, restoring Yemen’s legitimate government and containing Iran-backed Islamist threats in Sudan as well as the Eritrean regime. Ultimately, the United States and Europe need a reliable Israeli security guarantee in the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf to safeguard their own economic and existential interests.

It is within this new strategic framework that Somaliland becomes vital. Recognizing Somaliland is not only a moral imperative for Israel—aligning with Jewish values of backing liberty and self-determination—but also a cornerstone of Israel’s future security architecture. This grand strategy requires Israel to fill the security vacuum across the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Arabian Sea and the southwestern Indian Ocean in partnership with regional powers, and Somaliland is the beginning of that vision.

Israel already aligns with Ethiopia and Somaliland; Eritrea is the missing piece of the puzzle. Sudan lies within Eritrea’s strategic geography, and its ground forces possess the military capacity to crush the Houthis. With an aging dictator making political change inevitable, a powerful coalition is within reach. By combining Israel’s air superiority and defensive tech, Gulf financial power and the proven ground forces of Eritrea and Ethiopia, only a strong naval force to pacify Yemen and Sudan, contain Iran and permanently secure the Red Sea is required.

The Tigrinya people, the overwhelming majority who live in Eritrea, share a common destiny with Israel and the Jewish people. Just as the Jews have no homeland but Israel, they have no homeland but their own. Neither Eritrea nor Israel is a member of the Arab League or the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). Although the Tigrinya and the Jews are the overwhelming majorities in their respective countries, they remain tiny minorities in the wider region, surrounded by half a billion Arabs and Muslims.

Eritrea holds a strategic location at Bab el-Mandab in the Red Sea, ground military capability, historical perspective and the strategic patience to play the long game thanks to the Tigrinya nation’s homogeneity and nationalism. Eritrea stands as the region’s most stable state, yet its dictator weaponizes that stability to fuel regional chaos. A partnership with Israel would leverage the Tigrinya’s cheap labor and abundant resources alongside Israel’s know-how to produce high-quality ammunition and drones more cheaply than Iran and Turkey.

Their survival and future are permanently bound together. Today, China and the imperialist leaders of Iran and Turkey use proxies to threaten the Tigrinya’s historical role as the ultimate security guarantor of the Red Sea. That role must be reclaimed to remain vital to the security of Israel, the United States and Western allies, leveraging technology, investment and markets to overcome our existential crises at home: abject poverty and environmental devastation.

Rahm Emanuel thus missed a core truth: Israel’s survival depends on mastering its own backyard, not relying on Western capitals. Somaliland is just the start.

The final, essential piece of this Red Sea architecture is Eritrea, anchored by a Tigrinya majority bound to the Jewish people through the ancient Orit faith, and united against the shared security threat from Iran and its Islamist proxies.

Habtom Ghebrezghiabher , Ph.D., from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, is an expert on geopolitical and security dynamics in the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea region.

President Irro of Somaliland is in Israel on a State Visit

President Irro of Somaliland is in Israel on a State Visit

On Sunday, June 14, 2026, Somaliland President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi arrived in Jerusalem, making it the first time a leader from the Somaliland Republic in the Horn of Africa had visited Israel on an official visit. Since Israel became the first UN member state to formally recognize Somaliland’s sovereignty in December of last year, the bilateral relationship has drastically changed, and this visit marks a significant turning point.

The official opening of the Somaliland Embassy, an important symbolic event, is at the core of Jerusalem’s diplomatic agenda. Israeli President Isaac Herzog welcomed President Abdullahi to the President’s Residence and spoke to him in Somali and English.

Upon his arrival, President Abdullahi declared, “The people of Somaliland have built a peaceful, democratic, and resilient nation for 35 years.” “Do you see us?” we asked the world. Israel was the first to respond.

The visit comes after Israel became the first member of the UN to formally recognize the Republic of Somaliland in December 2025. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made this decision “in the spirit of the Abraham Accords,” and it was supported by pledges of broad collaboration in the fields of energy technology, agriculture, health, and water management.

The visit takes place in the context of growing regional security concerns, in addition to the diplomatic ceremony. The Red Sea, a vital conduit for international trade, is cited by analysts as the main force for the growing alliance. According to recent reports, Israel has expanded its intelligence presence in the area, and talks on the strategic value of the Berbera International Airport are still going on.

The engagement’s cornerstone continues to be security cooperation. The present team is anticipated to complete framework agreements on maritime security and information sharing, and reports suggest that Somaliland officials and presidential guard units have received training in Israel. Regional observers see these changes as an attempt to offset challenges, such as the actions of Houthi rebels operating along the Bab al-Mandab Strait.

There has been debate around the growing relationships. Israel’s recognition of Somaliland has been repeatedly denounced by the Federal Government of Somalia as an infringement on its geographical integrity and sovereignty. Concern has also been voiced by regional nations, with China expressing unease about the possibility of an Israeli presence close to its maritime trading routes.

A visit to Yad Vashem, the World Holocaust Remembrance Center, and a number of high-level talks with Israel’s defense, finance, and economy ministries are part of President Abdullahi’s program, which runs through Thursday.

Hargeisa nevertheless faces the difficulty of converting this diplomatic victory into real infrastructure and economic benefits. Jerusalem views the visit as a strategic outreach effort to broaden its regional partnerships. The international world is still concerned about how this unique collaboration would affect the precarious balance of power in the Horn of Africa as the Somaliland Embassy is ready to open.

Thirty-five Years Later, Somaliland Still Stands

Thirty-five Years Later, Somaliland Still Stands

There are certain anniversaries that, over time, become personal and cease to belong to history alone. They settle into the emotional memory of a people, carried in households, conversations, songs, and passed from one generation to the next. For Somalilanders, May 18 is one of those days.

Every year when this anniversary approaches, I find myself thinking more about the generation that endured war, displacement, and unimaginable uncertainty, yet still found within themselves the strength to rebuild. I think about those who buried loved ones and returned to cities reduced to rubble, only to begin again from almost nothing.

To understand the emotional significance of May 18, one must first understand the history that preceded it.

On June 26, 1960, the former British Somaliland Protectorate attained independence as the State of Somaliland. Days later, driven by the optimism of the era and the wider dream of Somali unity, Somaliland voluntarily entered into union with the Trust Territory of Somalia in pursuit of a greater Somali republic.

At the time, it was a sincere political vision. Across Africa, newly independent nations were emerging from colonial rule with enormous hope and ambition, imagining futures shaped by unity, self-determination, and shared identity. Somalilanders, too, believed they were contributing to something larger than themselves.

But history unfolded differently.

The years that followed gradually gave way to political marginalization, authoritarianism, violence, and ultimately the collapse of the Somali state itself. For Somaliland, particularly during the final years of the military regime, the consequences were devastating. Entire communities were displaced. Cities were heavily damaged. Families were fractured by war and loss. Much of the physical and institutional foundation of society was left in ruins.

And yet, even in the aftermath of such destruction, Somaliland’s story did not end there. This part of its history deeply moves me because Somaliland was not rebuilt under easy circumstances. It was rebuilt by people who had every reason to surrender to exhaustion and despair, yet chose not to. There was no certainty then that peace would endure. No certainty that the institutions being formed would survive. No certainty that the sacrifices being made would amount to anything lasting.

And still, they built.

They built through dialogue. Through reconciliation. Through communities willing to sit together after years of conflict and slowly attempt the difficult work of trusting one another again. Elders and ordinary citizens alike became part of a national conversation about coexistence, governance and survival.

What Somaliland achieved through locally led reconciliation remains one of the most important yet often overlooked chapters in modern African state-building.

Because rebuilding after conflict is not simply an infrastructural exercise, it is psychological. It requires people to trust again. To coexist again. To sit across from one another again after years in which fear and violence had shaped everyday life.

Over the course of my first year serving as Ambassador of the Republic of Somaliland to Kenya, I have found myself reflecting on this history much more deeply than ever before. Representing Somaliland has reminded me that behind every national story are ordinary people whose resilience carried history forward. And perhaps nowhere is that resilience more visible than within Somaliland’s diaspora communities, with whom I have the honor of interacting.

Thirty-five years later, this past year has, in many ways, felt like a moment in which the outside world has begun paying closer attention to a reality Somalilanders have long known and sustained for themselves.

Conversations surrounding Somaliland have gradually shifted toward discussions of partnership, stability, trade, regional security, and its growing role within the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea corridor.

That shift became particularly noticeable following the State of Israel’s formal recognition of Somaliland in December 2025, a development that marked an important diplomatic moment in Somaliland’s modern history. Yet even then, it did not feel like the beginning of Somaliland’s story. If anything, it felt like a long-overdue acknowledgement of a reality that Somalilanders themselves had never abandoned.

Thirty five years later, Somaliland’s story remains, above all else, a human one. A story carried by memory, sacrifice and reconciliation. It is to that generation that I pay tribute today.

By Dr. Mohamed Abdillahi Omar, Ambassador of the Republic of Somaliland to the Republic of Kenya

Israel’s Deputy Ambassador to Ethiopia Praises Somaliland

Israel’s Deputy Ambassador to Ethiopia Praises Somaliland

Israel is seeking to deepen ties with Somaliland following its recognition of the territory as an independent state in December 2025, with Israeli officials pointing to potential cooperation in agriculture, logistics, and infrastructure as part of a broader push tied to its highly controversial move to become the first country to recognize Somaliland.

Speaking to The Reporter Ethiopia, Israel’s deputy ambassador to Ethiopia, Tomer Bar-Lavi, said recent high-level talks between Israeli and Somaliland business leaders in Addis Ababa had produced positive initial engagement and could pave the way for future investment discussions.

“There were some initial meetings and they were very positive,” Bar-Lavi said. “We saw that the sentiment is there, and it’s very positive on both sides.”

He said Israeli companies were prepared to support Somaliland in sectors including agriculture, logistics, infrastructure, and medicine, though any future projects would depend on commercial demand.

“Our businesses are demand-driven,” he said. “They can provide whatever the other side needs regarding agriculture, logistics, infrastructure, medicine, and beyond.”

Israel’s recognition of Somaliland has attracted attention across the Horn of Africa and the wider international community. Somaliland, which declared independence from Somalia in 1991 following the collapse of the Somali central government, has since maintained de facto autonomy with its own government, security forces, currency, and domestic institutions.

Despite functioning as a self-governing territory for more than three decades, Somaliland has struggled to gain formal international recognition. Israel’s decision to recognize Somaliland therefore marked a historic diplomatic breakthrough for Hargeisa, making Israel the first country to officially acknowledge Somaliland as a “sovereign state.” The move has sparked diplomatic backlash from Somalia, which continues to regard Somaliland as part of its territory, as well as from several of Somalia’s allies and many Muslim-majority countries that have criticized Israel’s decision and condemned the recognition as a violation of Somalia’s territorial integrity.

Since the recognition announcement, relations between Tel Aviv and Hargeisa have expanded. Last month, Israel announced the appointment of a non-resident ambassador to Somaliland. In addition, officials from both governments have exchanged diplomatic correspondence concerning potential trade opportunities, investment projects, and broader economic partnerships.

Bar-Lavi told The Reporter that Israel viewed the move as recognition of “a reality which has existed on the ground” and described Somaliland as “a stable new partner in the Horn of Africa.”

Asked whether the decision could complicate Israel’s ties with Ethiopia or other African states, Bar-Lavi said each country pursued its own strategic interests and argued that Somaliland’s inclusion in regional diplomacy should be viewed positively.

“In our view, we are recognizing a reality which has existed,” he said. “This is a moderate country which has been de facto independent for decades, fighting terrorism.”

He added that Somaliland had expressed interest in joining international frameworks such as the Abraham Accords, which Israel sees as promoting regional cooperation.

“Israel has very good relations with the vast majority of Sub-Saharan African states and adding one more such state is, in our view, a very positive move that should be taken as an example by others,” Bar-Lavi said.

Though much of the relationship between Israel and Somaliland has remained opaque, developments in recent months have drawn increasing attention, particularly following the appointment of ambassadors representing Tel Aviv and Hargeisa. Israel has shown growing interest in expanding its security footprint in the Horn of Africa, a region that has become a battleground for competition among emerging Middle Eastern powers. The United Arab Emirates, which has long maintained significant influence in both Somaliland and Puntland, has also been linked to plans for a multi-country military network across the region, including in Somaliland.

According to a recent report by Le Monde, Berbera Airport is undergoing a major but low-profile military redevelopment involving several international actors. Drawing on satellite imagery and security sources, the newspaper reported that extensive construction took place between late 2025 and early 2026, coinciding with Israel’s recognition of Somaliland, including buried structures believed to be fortified fuel or ammunition storage sites, as well as elevated installations thought to support air defense systems similar to those seen in other Emirati-backed facilities in the region.

The report noted that the project is being led by the UAE under its defense partnership with Somaliland, while sources also allege that the development serves the strategic interests of both the United States and Israel. Le Monde also reported that Somaliland intelligence officials have quietly received training in Tel Aviv and that Israeli intelligence personnel have recently visited Berbera, reinforcing earlier reports of growing security cooperation between the two sides.

Although neither the UAE, Israel, nor Somaliland has officially acknowledged the existence of a military base in Berbera, Abu Dhabi already maintains extensive control over the port through a $400 million investment agreement signed with Somaliland authorities. The UAE has also been linked to a similar military facility in Puntland’s Bosaso, which has reportedly served as a transit hub for military logistics and mercenary operations connected to Abu Dhabi’s support for the RSF in Sudan. Somaliland officials, meanwhile, have not ruled out the possibility that military cooperation could become part of broader relations with Israel.

The remarks made by Bar-Lavi reflects the deepening ties between Hargeisa and Tel Aviv, despite widespread criticism from Somalia’s allies, the African Union, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, and several members of the Gulf Cooperation Council. Somaliland’s president recently described Israel as a “reliable partner.” Previously, the president had praised Israel’s decisions and signaled his administration’s willingness to further strengthen and deepen relations between the two sides.

Israeli President to Receive Credentials of Somaliland Ambassador

Israeli President to Receive Credentials of Somaliland Ambassador

Israeli President Isaac Herzog will receive the diplomatic credentials of the first-ever ambassador of Somaliland, Mohamed Hagi, along with those of other new envoys on Monday, his office announced.

The ceremony comes on the heels of Israel approving the appointment of veteran diplomat Michael Lotem as ambassador to Somaliland in April.

Somaliland dissolved its union with Somalia and declared its independence in 1991. Israel is the first country to recognize Somaliland.

Situated in the Horn of Africa, Somaliland’s northern coast lies directly across the Gulf of Aden from Yemen, where the Houthis control territory. Israel is reportedly interested in establishing a base in Somaliland to counter Houthi and Iranian threats to Red Sea shipping. Officials in Hargeisa, Somaliland’s capital, are interested in cooperating in areas of energy, infrastructure and agriculture, among other things.

Somaliland President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi has also expressed interest in joining the Abraham Accords.

Herzog will also receive the credentials of ambassadors from Australia, South Korea, Vietnam and the Vatican.

Somaliland Is Drawn Into a Perilous Middle East

Somaliland Is Drawn Into a Perilous Middle East

Israel’s recognition of Somaliland has given the nation long-sought visibility. It has also drawn it into the growing tensions reshaping the region.

Omar Ahmed and Ismail Bihaya are still a little dazed. In late March, the two hydrologists, both 32, were taking selfies on the esplanade of Jerusalem’s mosques, framed by the dazzling gold of the Dome of the Rock. The trip, the first of their lives, had long felt out of reach. Their country, the Republic of Somaliland, does not exist in the eyes of the world. “Our passport isn’t recognized anywhere. Except now, Israel,” Omar says with a grin, back in the lab where he and his colleague spend their days testing the water quality of Hargeisa, the capital of this breakaway region of Somalia.

Everything changed on December 26. That day, Israel became the first country to formally recognize Somaliland (formerly British Somaliland) as a sovereign state. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared in a video call congratulating Somaliland’s president, Abdirahman Abdullahi.

The backlash was immediate. Somalia, the African Union, the Arab League, and even the UN Security Council condemned the move, accusing Israel of violating the principle of territorial integrity.

In Hargeisa, those reactions barely registered. That night, crowds flooded the streets in celebration. For several days, Israeli journalists covering the event were greeted with cheers as they moved through the city, an almost surreal scene in a Muslim-majority country, and all the more striking in the immediate aftermath of the war in Gaza.

Downtown Hargeisa, capital of Somaliland
Downtown Hargeisa, the capital of Somaliland

 

To understand that joy, one has to go back to the late 1980s. A former British protectorate, Somaliland had actually gained independence in 1960 before voluntarily uniting with the former Italian protectorate of Somalia. The union soon began to unravel. Amid growing clan tensions, the Somalia regime in Mogadishu launched a brutal campaign against the northern region, culminating in the near-total destruction of Hargeisa in 1988. The civil war left between 50,000 and 200,000 dead. “Hundreds of thousands more were driven into exile,” recalls a businessman who returned years later. “It was apocalyptic.” In 1991, as Somalia descended into chaos, Somaliland declared independence.More than three decades later, that independence remains unrecognized. Except, now, by Israel.

Omar Ahmed, chief engineer, Somaliland, Ministry of Water
Omar Ahmed, chief engineer at Somaliland’s Ministry of Water, was part of a delegation of 25 experts sent to Israel in March to train in modern irrigation techniques

Israel’s Intentions

To inaugurate their new partnership, Israeli authorities invited 25 Somaliland hydrologists for training in modern irrigation and water management. Omar and Ismail were among them. They came back impressed. “The scale of their desalination plants is staggering,” Omar says. “They are global leaders in water management. With infrastructure like that, we could completely transform our country.” Cooperation has accelerated quickly. Beyond training programs, Israel has announced investments in Somaliland’s infrastructure. The two governments exchanged ambassadors in April. Still, few here believe Israel’s intentions are purely developmental.

Tel Aviv is widely seen as eyeing Somaliland’s strategic location: roughly 500 miles of coastline along the Gulf of Aden, through which around 12 percent of global trade passes — an ideal vantage point from which to project military power. According to Bloomberg, Israeli officials have already identified a potential coastal site for a future base, a claim Somaliland has publicly denied.

Whether Israel actually intends to establish a military presence remains officially unconfirmed. Asked directly, a senior official at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs dismissed the Bloomberg report as lacking “clarity,” without explicitly denying it.

 televised debate, MMTV, alliance, Somaliland, Israel
A televised debate on MMTV, Somaliland’s main television channel, about the alliance between Somaliland and Israel.

That ambiguity contrasts with what is said more privately. Several sources with close ties to the Somaliland authorities describe the project as an “open secret.” “Israelis want a base in Somaliland to monitor the Bab el-Mandeb Strait and the Houthis in Yemen. The government simply cannot confirm it yet, given the ongoing turmoil in the Middle East,” said a businessman with close ties to power.

In practice, no agreement has been announced and no infrastructure is visible on the ground. But the convergence of discreet diplomatic contacts, strategic logic, and local expectations has made the prospect of a base feel less like a distant possibility than a question of timing.

America’s Interests

Other countries are watching closely.

Aerial view, port of Berbera, Somaliland, DP World
Aerial view of the port of Berbera, in western Somaliland, developed by the Emirati company DP World. Photo credit: DP World

Ethiopia, landlocked and eager for access to the sea, nearly finalized a deal in 2024 to secure a 12-mile coastal strip of Somaliland along the Gulf of Aden before backing down under pressure from Mogadishu. The United Arab Emirates, which normalized relations with Israel under the Abraham Accords, has also taken a keen interest in the region. Starting in 2016, its port operator, DP World, has built a major terminal in the Gulf port of Berbera.

“We’ve invested $400 million,” says Maftouh Harir, a DP World executive, standing high above the docks on a towering quay crane. “The goal is to serve Ethiopia, which has no access to the sea.” Out on the horizon, a control tower rises above the sea spray. Nearby, Berbera’s airport, whose runway is among the longest in Africa, is no longer open to the public. Abu Dhabi is now converting it into a military base.

Ultimately, however, Somaliland’s hopes rest largely in Washington.

Within parts of Somaliland’s establishment, support for recognition has been building. As early as 2021, the Heritage Foundation published a policy paper urging the United States to recognize Somaliland as a way to counter China’s growing influence in nearby Djibouti, where Beijing has established its only overseas naval base just miles from a US installation.

Port of Berbera, Somaliland, Emirati company, DP World
Aerial view of the Berbera, developed by the Emirati company DP World. Photo credit: DP World

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), a close ally of Israel, has emerged as one of Hargeisa’s most vocal supporters. During a Senate hearing on April 23, he emphasized Somaliland’s “growing strategic relevance” and suggested that Donald Trump could formally recognize the territory before the end of his term.

At the same time, several members of the House of Representatives introduced legislation in March directing the Treasury Department to identify legal barriers preventing Somaliland from accessing the US financial system. The goal is to integrate Somaliland into the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, or SWIFT network, a crucial step for dollar transactions. “Our banks cannot raise capital on international markets,” explains a Somaliland economist. “That forces them to charge prohibitively high interest rates. Access to SWIFT would be even more decisive than diplomatic recognition.”

For now, Somaliland’s government is trying to turn these diplomatic signals into economic gains. At the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Hargeisa, a delegation of Australian businessmen has come to explore opportunities in the mining sector. “What are your impressions of the country?” the minister asks, smiling broadly. “Very positive,” replies one of the visitors. “It was important for us to see things firsthand. We’ll be sending a positive message to our shareholders.”

“They can rest easy,” the minister says. “Somaliland is a haven of peace and stability. It’s the safest place in the Horn of Africa.”

‘A Functioning Democracy, the Most Advanced in the Region’

From the ground, Hargeisa bears the marks of a surprisingly dynamic African city. Cafés are filled with a stylish youth. Students snap selfies to celebrate the opening of a waffle shop. A new shopping mall of glass and steel is preparing to open its doors. Power outages are rare. The streets are clean. Markets are well stocked. And overlooking it all, the country’s first five-star hotel, which opened last August, glows at dusk.

market, Hargeisa, capital, Somaliland
A market in Hargeisa.

Despite lacking international recognition, Somaliland’s gross domestic product (GDP) per capita is about 50 percent higher than that of Somalia, and its poverty rate is roughly half. Even more striking is its political system.

“We are a functioning democracy, the most advanced in the region,” says Guleid Jama, a lawyer known for his work defending fundamental rights. “Since 1991, we’ve held six presidential elections, each followed by a peaceful transfer of power.” He is quick to add a caveat. “Our constitution, adopted in 2001, is relatively progressive. But our penal code still reflects the Mussolini-era legacy of Italian colonial law. Police frequently interfere with journalists and opposition figures.”

Marwo Sucaad, an opposition leader, confirms the mixed picture. “Our governments are elected democratically. There’s no doubt about that,” she says. “The 2024 campaign was vibrant, turnout was high. But corruption exists, and women remain largely excluded from power. No democracy is perfect, though.”

Marwo Sucaad, leading opposition figure, KAAH party, Hargeisa
The politician Marwo Sucaad, a leading opposition figure, at the headquarters of her Kaah party in Hargeisa.

Yet Somaliland’s stability rests on a delicate political balance. Power is largely concentrated in the hands of the central clan, which dominates the country demographically and territorially, particularly around Hargeisa. Other major groups in the west and the in the east, are integrated into the political system, but not without tension.

So far, this equilibrium has held. Since 1991, Somaliland has avoided the kind of fragmentation seen elsewhere in the region by maintaining a relatively cohesive state structure and repeated peaceful transfers of power. But that cohesion is not immutable. In the eastern regions, territorial disputes persist. In Las Anod, clashes that erupted in 2023 between Somaliland forces and local militias aligned with Somalia in the south left hundreds dead and displaced tens of thousands, exposing the fragility of the territory’s hold over its eastern fringes.

Israel’s arrival may now complicate that fragile balance.

‘Now That We Are Allied With Israel, Could This War Reach Us?’

Gulf of Aden, coast, Berbera, Somaliland, port
Berbera, Somaliland’s main port city, sits on the coast of the Gulf of Aden.

Barely two months after recognition, Tel Aviv became embroiled in a confrontation with Iran whose consequences could extend into the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. On the set of Somaliland’s main television channel, MMTV, the tone of debate has shifted.

“Now that we are allied with Israel, could this war reach us?” a journalist asked a political analyst in early April. “We have nothing to fear,” the analyst replied confidently. “Since the attacks of October 7, 2023, Israel has gained the upper hand over its enemies. It has become the dominant power in the Middle East. This alliance will allow us to develop, just as Saudi Arabia benefited from US protection after World War II.”

Others are less assured. In Yemen, the Houthi movement declared on December 28 that Berbera had become a “legitimate target.” Somaliland has limited means of deterrence. Its military is largely equipped with tanks and rocket launchers captured from Mogadishu at the end of the 1980s civil war and has no air-defense capabilities.

patrol, Somaliland, coast guard, port of Berbera
On patrol with Somaliland’s coast guard at the entrance to the port of Berbera. With limited resources, they monitor nearly 500 miles of coastline facing Yemen.

“Somaliland is preparing for this kind of scenario,” insists a senior official at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. “Our generals are working day and night to ensure the country’s security.”

But for opposition figures, the greater risk lies elsewhere. “The eastern regions are still disputed,” worries Marwo Suad. “Somalia, backed by Turkey, China, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, could resume hostilities in response to Israel’s recognition. We are on the brink of another war.” Al-Shabaab, a powerful Somali insurgency group affiliated with al-Qaeda, has also vowed to fight any attempt by Israel to establish a presence in Somaliland.

“Only Washington can rein in Somalia’s backers,” says Marwo Suad. “That is the only protection that truly matters.” The government appears to share that view. In late February, it declared its readiness to grant the United States “exclusive access” to its mineral resources, as well as access to military bases. US military delegations visited Hargeisa and Berbera in June and November 2025. Still, there is little indication that Washington is eager to deploy troops, especially as the United States already maintains a base in Djibouti and cooperates with Mogadishu on counterterrorism.

On patrol, Somaliland, coast guard, Yemen
On patrol with Somaliland’s coast guard at the entrance to the port of Berbera. With limited resources, they monitor nearly 800 kilometers of coastline facing Yeme

For Somaliland’s leadership, however, recognition is only a means to a more immediate end: economic development. And here, the gap between expectations and reality remains stark.

Beneath Somaliland’s soil, geological surveys also suggest the presence of oil, gas, lithium, rare earth elements, and other minerals. Several foreign companies have already taken positions. The British firm Genel Energy has been exploring hydrocarbons since 2012. Taiwan’s Chang Development Company and Saudi Arabia’s Kilomass are looking into lithium. EAU Mining, the Australian company whose delegation visited Hargeisa, may soon follow. Yet beyond these early indicators, few deposits have been formally confirmed, and most projects are still at a preliminary stage.

Australian mining investors, foreign minister, Somaliland
A group of Australian mining investors meets with the foreign minister in Hargeisa

On the ground, investors are watching more than they are committing. The businessmen arriving in Hargeisa are not responding to a proven resource boom so much as to a political signal: the possibility that recognition could unlock access to international markets, financing, and legal protections that have long been out of reach.

Ahmed Osman Guelleh, a local industrialist, urges caution. “Mining is not how we will create the thousands of industrial jobs our youth need,” he says, standing in a warehouse stacked with crates of Coca-Cola bottled in his factory north of Hargeisa. “We need to focus on manufacturing, technology, and agriculture. Once we build that economic base, international recognition will follow naturally.”

For now, Somaliland faces structural constraints that recognition alone cannot resolve. Electricity is expensive, generated almost entirely from fuel oil. The workforce remains largely unskilled. Water is scarce in this arid climate. In the laboratory in Hargeisa, where he spends his days testing the city’s water, Omar Ahmed has been thinking about that gap ever since he returned from Israel.

“The scale of what we saw there… it’s billions of dollars,” he says. “Our entire Ministry of Water runs on about $1.8 million a year. Agriculture gets barely $2.8 million. Even with help from NGOs, we’re talking about a few million here and there. What we actually need is on a completely different scale.”

He pauses. “That’s the real gap. We come back with the knowledge, but we don’t have the money to do anything with it.” In a country that does not officially exist, recognition may open doors. But it will not, on its own, build a future.

Somalia & Somaliland: Battlegrounds as Turkey and Israel Seek the Control of the Red Sea

Somalia & Somaliland: Battlegrounds as Turkey and Israel Seek the Control of the Red Sea

Turkey and Israel are intensifying competition in the Horn of Africa, with Somalia and Somaliland emerging as key battlegrounds for oil, military influence and control of vital Red Sea trade routes.

Turkey has consolidated its position through formal agreements with Somalia’s federal government, securing major offshore and onshore oil and gas exploration rights alongside a strong military presence through its largest overseas training base. Israel, meanwhile, has moved closer to Somaliland after becoming the first country to formally recognize the territory as an independent state and is exploring plans for a military base near the Gulf of Aden to monitor Yemen’s Houthis and secure strategic access to the Red Sea corridor.

Earlier this year, Somalia confirmed it was ready to begin its first offshore oil drilling operations, with a Turkish government-owned drilling ship expected to arrive off its coast, according to BBC. The move followed the successful completion of seismic surveys last year by Turkey’s research vessel Oruç Reis, which collected 3D seismic data across key offshore blocks.

Somalia is estimated to hold at least 30 billion barrels of offshore oil potential and around 6 billion cubic meters of natural gas, though much of it remains unproven compared with established producers such as Libya and Nigeria.

Since 2011, Turkey has become one of Mogadishu’s closest allies, combining humanitarian support, military training and infrastructure investment. In December 2025, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said Ankara planned to establish a spaceport in Somalia.

Subsequent reports later confirmed that Turkey was exploring a broader aerospace facility, including a spaceport for satellite and possible missile launches, alongside plans for a naval base, while F-16 fighter jets were deployed inside Somalia in early 2026. In February 2026, Turkey also dispatched ageing U.S.-made M48 and M60 tanks through the streets of Mogadishu in a protected convoy after they were unloaded from a Turkish Navy landing ship.

According to reports, the tanks were deployed to secure Turkish facilities in the Warsheikh area, about 37 miles north of the capital, where Ankara is building the site for satellite launches and broader aerospace operations. Separately, Turkey recently reopened its $50 million military base in Mogadishu, reinforcing Ankara’s role in Somalia’s security sector and its support for the training of Somali National Army soldiers, including elite units involved in operations against Al-Shabaab.

Israel, meanwhile, has focused on Somaliland, whose coastline faces Yemen across the Gulf of Aden. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced in late 2025 that Israel had formally recognized Somaliland, describing the decision as being “in the spirit of the Abraham Accords.” The recognition triggered strong condemnation from Somalia and several Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia, Palestine, Egypt, Kuwait, Iraq, Jordan and Qatar, all of which rejected the decision as illegal and warned that it threatened regional stability and Somalia’s territorial unity.

Turkey also criticized the move, with President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan calling Israel’s recognition of Somaliland “illegitimate and unacceptable” and later saying it “does not benefit” the region during a February visit to Ethiopia, one of Israel’s key allies in the Horn of Africa.

Despite the criticism, a Bloomberg report in March confirmed that Israel was exploring plans to build a military base in Somaliland to monitor and target Yemen’s Houthis, taking advantage of the region’s strategic location near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. Defending the move, Shiri Fein-Grossman, chief executive of the Israel-Africa Relations Institute and a former member of Israel’s National Security Council, told Israeli outlet i24 News: “Everyone just looks at the map and understands what Israel is looking for here.”

“The recognition of Somaliland gives Israel a strategic location near the Houthis in Yemen and comes at a time that Israel needs as many friends as possible.”

Beyond Somalia and Somaliland, tensions between Turkey and Israel have deepened over Gaza, Syria and wider regional power projection, further exposing a growing geopolitical rivalry between the two military powers.

Middle East Eye reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has increasingly shifted his rhetoric towards Turkey as Ankara expands its influence across the eastern Mediterranean and Africa, particularly around Cyprus and Greece. In a post on X, Netanyahu accused President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan of “massacring his own Kurdish citizens” and “accommodating Iran’s terror regime and its proxies”.

Turkey responded with sharp condemnation, with officials in Ankara describing Netanyahu as the “Hitler of the era”, citing Israel’s military actions in Gaza and across the region.

While Somalia and Somaliland remain central to their competition in the Horn of Africa, the broader dispute reflects a much wider struggle for influence stretching from the Red Sea to the Middle East, with both military powers seeking strategic bases in the two African territories to strengthen their regional reach.

Olamilekan Okebiorun is a business journalist covering markets, technology, and changing landscape of African economies for Business Insider Africa.

Somaliland: Children with Disabilities Still Face Barriers to Education

Rhima’s first step into school

Every morning, Rahima used to sit outside her home and listen. She listened to the laughter of children walking to school. She listened to their footsteps fading down the dusty road. And she imagined what it might feel like to walk beside them.

“I wished I could go with them,” she says quietly. But for years, school felt impossible.

When Rahima was nine years old, she was diagnosed with aggressive bone cancer. Her mother still remembers the moment clearly. “We did not know what tomorrow would look like,” she says. “We were very afraid.” The treatment saved Rahima’s life. But it came at a cost. Doctors had to amputate her right leg.

“I felt like my whole life had stopped,” Rahima recalls. After the surgery, she remained at home. Her parents worried she would face stigma from other children and the wider community. With limited income, they could not afford the support she needed to start school. As the years passed, Rahima watched other children leave for class each day while she stayed behind.

Opening doors for more children

Across Somaliland, many children with disabilities still face barriers to education.

Recent disability assessments conducted in twenty Education Cannot Wait (ECW)–supported schools identified 72 children with disabilities, many of whom had never accessed education due to stigma, limited support, or financial constraints. Through the ECW‑funded Multi‑Year Resilience Program (MYRP)—implemented by UNICEF in collaboration with the Ministry of Education and Science (MOES), Africa Educational Trust (AET) and local education partners—children with disabilities and out‑of‑school learners are being prioritized with scholarships and inclusive Accelerated Basic Education (ABE) pathways to restore their right to learn.

For families like Rahima’s, these changes are opening doors that once seemed permanently closed.

A future reimagined

Now settled into her learning journey, Rahima dreams of becoming a teacher.

“There are many girls like me still at home,” she says. “One day I want to help them learn too.”

Her story is a testament to the transformative power of inclusive education, made possible through the ECW‑funded MYRP, dedicated educators, and a community beginning to believe that every child deserves a place in school. For Rahima, the scholarship opened more than a school door. It gave her the chance to learn, to belong — and to dream again!

Impact beyond one child

The disability assessment in the ECW schools found significant numbers of children with:

  • Learning difficulties (32 cases)
  • Mobility impairment (13 cases)
  • Vision impairments (11 cases)
  • Hearing impairments (7 cases)
  • Behavioral challenges (7 cases)

These findings have strengthened inclusive practices, improved early identification of learning needs, and guided scholarship prioritisation to ensure children like Raxiima are not left behind.

Beyond the numbers, the assessments have also helped communities recognise that disability should not mean exclusion from education. By identifying barriers early and connecting families with schools and support programs, the ECW-supported initiative is helping more children with disabilities step into classrooms, rebuild confidence and begin their own learning journeys — just as Rahima has.